Clive Thompson's article "Brave New World of Digital Intimacy."
1. Describe what Thompson means by the title of this article - "Brave New World of Digital Intimacy" - in 3-5 sentences.
Thompson is referencing the almost false sense of intimacy that is crated through the use of online social media tools such as facebook and twitter. By following and “friending” hundreds of people on facebook, users are putting themselves out into the world like never before. If this type of flimsy digital intimacy is a good thing or bad thing remains to be seen.
2. Describe three PROS and three CONS of this new world, according to the research and individuals profiled in Thompson's article. Be specific.
PROs: One of the most obvious positive side affects of this new world is the ability to connect with others at any point during the day. These new types of technology allow us to become connected at all times, which ultimately can strengthen relationships. Another potential positive side affect is sited by Laura Fitton, the constant updates not only connect us to our friends, but help us connect to ourselves.
CONs: For me personally I see the biggest problem with this system to be the laid back approach to personal relationships and personal privacy. As discussed by Leisa Reichelt, the possible lasting affects of this type of non stop social updates is unknown, and the affects these tools may have on a persons ability to cultivate real interpersonal relationships is still to be seen.
3. What does Thompson mean by the phrase "ambient" awareness"? What do YOU think are the specific pros and cons of living in an online world of "ambient awareness"? Do you accept Thompson's conclusion that "ambient awareness" can have some therapeutic effects - making you a "happier person, a calmer person," or are you more skeptical? Justify your position.
Ambient awareness as described in this article I liken to being able to watch someone, like a neighbor, without ever really meeting or getting to know them. You can see what they are doing, but you are an observer not an active participant in their daily life. I feel this way when I read a status update or a new posting on twitter. I feel a little like a peeping tom. I constantly know what my “friends” are up too, but only in an observer sense. I find the opposite of Thompson when it comes to the therapeutic part of the updates. The constant need to trim down what is happening/relevant in my life into less then 160 characters is stressful and frustrating. A majority of the time I feel overwhelmed by all the updates I receive. I am still trying to find a balance between active and passive participation.
Right now my status update is: Caitlin Pierce is trying to teach GUS how to pee in the litter box, not on it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

Hi Caitlin,
ReplyDeleteExcellent analysis here.
Did Gus figure out how to do the job right?
:)
And more importantly, does the cat have a Twitter account?
W
Doc Dub,
ReplyDeleteYour comments got me thinking... Gus should go web 2.0. Maybe I can set up some kitty playdates through social media sites. I've set Gus up with a facebook account... he's going live!
I'll be sure to friend you on his behalf!